by Andrea Howe | Dec 15, 2008 | Client relationships
Tiziana Casciaro and Miguel Sousa Lobo wrote in “Competent Jerks, Lovable Fools, and the Formation of Social Networks” in the Harvard Business Review (June 2005) about how people choose who they work with.
“In most cases, people choose their work partners according to two criteria. One is competence at the job…the other is likability.”
by Andrea Howe | Dec 10, 2008 | Client relationships
Next week we’ll be unveiling our new white paper called Learning that STICks – a practical guide to avoiding disappointing returns on soft skills training.
Learning that STICks is learning that is Sustainable, Transformational, Intelligent and Collaborative. STICky learning is flexible; it can expand or contract to fit time, budget, and resource constraints. But in every case, being STICky pays off.
To give you a taste of what Learning that STICks is all about, here are some examples of quick ways to implement STICky learning:
by Andrea Howe | Nov 18, 2008 | Client relationships, Featured blogs, Trusted advisorship
In our Trusted Advisor workshops and coaching engagements, we spend a lot of time on listening. Why? Because not listening is one of the top two causes of trust breakdown. (The other — accelerating too quickly to a solution – is another form of not listening.)
Listening is critical to advice-giving because it’s through listening that we earn the right to offer advice.
by Andrea Howe | Oct 2, 2008 | Trusted advisorship
Charlie Green, co-author of The Trusted Advisor, has just released a compilation of his best blog posts in a great little e-book called The Trust Matters Primer: The best of the Trusted Advisor Blog.
by Andrea Howe | Sep 17, 2008 | Consulting
We just completed our second delivery of BossaNova’s Advanced Facilitation Skills for Consultants program. We saw once again that a consultant’s biggest fear when it comes to facilitating client events is, hands-down, dealing with difficult group dynamics – you know, managing the client who’s overly talkative, highly argumentative, prone to ramble, stubbornly skeptical, and the like.